1. The Court may penalise persons present before it who commit misconduct, including the interruption of its proceedings or the intentional refusal to comply with its instructions, by administrative measures other than imprisonment, such as temporary or permanent removal from the courtroom, a fine or other similar measures provided for in the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. 2. Immunities or special procedural rules which, under national or international law, may be linked to the official status of a person shall not prevent the Court from exercising its jurisdiction over such a person. (iii) Deliberately target personnel, facilities, equipment, units or vehicles participating in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, provided that they are entitled to the protection accorded to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict; In addition to other grounds for criminal liability under this Statute for offences within the jurisdiction of the Court: (i) shall be carried out for the purpose of promoting the criminal activity or purpose of the group, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of an offence within the jurisdiction of the Court; or recalling that it is the duty of each State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes, 1. The criminal liability of a person under these Statutes shall not be incurred unless the conduct in question constitutes an offence within the jurisdiction of the Court at the time of the event. (f) Attempts to commit such a crime by taking measures that trigger its execution in a substantial step, but the crime does not occur due to circumstances independent of the person`s intentions. However, a person who renounces his efforts to commit the offence or who otherwise prevents the completion of the offence shall not be punished under this Statute for attempting to commit that offence if he has completely and voluntarily abandoned the criminal purpose. (c) in the absence of its general principles of law derived by the Court from the domestic law of the legal systems of the world, including, where appropriate, the domestic laws of States which would normally exercise jurisdiction over the offence, provided that such principles are not incompatible with this Statute and with international law and internationally recognized norms and standards. 3. The application and interpretation of the law referred to in this Article shall be compatible with internationally recognised human rights and shall be without adverse distinction based on grounds such as sex as defined in Article 7(3), age, race, colour, language, religion or belief, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, wealth, birth or other status. Nothing in this Part shall be construed as restricting or interfering in any way with existing or evolving rules of international law for purposes other than this Statute.

1. The execution of a custodial sentence shall be subject to review by the Court and shall be in accordance with the generally accepted rules of international treaties governing the treatment of prisoners. 1. In addition to the other grounds for exclusion from criminal liability provided for in this Statute, a person shall not be criminally liable if, at the time of that person`s conduct: in addition to the factual information that NGOs may provide to the Court, he or she may also present legal analyses or political arguments in an amicus curiae, a legal document; adopted by one of the Chambers of the Court (i.e. friend of the Court). A judicial chamber may request a State, organization or individual to file a written statement on a specific subject, called an amicus curiae letter. The Amicus Curiae is prepared by an organization that has a professional interest in the subject. It presents the issue at stake in a concise manner and makes proposals to the Court of Justice on how to resolve the issue. The Amicus Curiae gives NGOs the opportunity to be consulted on a number of legal and practical issues, such as the jurisdiction of national courts to prosecute a case. NGOs can also contact a room and offer to drop off an amicus curiae.

(1) An error of fact is a ground for exclusion from criminal liability only if it denies the mental element required for the offence. (a) The requested State, if it is not subject to an existing obligation under international law to extradite the person to the requesting State, shall give priority to the Request of the Court; (b) Second, where appropriate, the applicable treaties and the principles and rules of international law, including established principles of the international law of armed conflict; When a State Party is requested by the Court to provide a document in its custody, possession or control, or information communicated to it in confidence by a State, an intergovernmental organization or an international organization, it shall obtain the author`s consent to the disclosure of that document or information. Subject to article 72, if the author is a Contracting State, he either accepts the disclosure of the information or document or undertakes to clarify the question of disclosure with the Court. If the author is not a Contracting State and refuses to consent to the disclosure, the requested State shall inform the Court that it is unable to provide the document or information because of an existing obligation of confidentiality towards the author. 3. Under this Statute, a person shall be criminally responsible and punishable for an offence falling within the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice if that person (d)(2)(c) applies to non-international armed conflicts and therefore does not apply to situations of internal disturbance and tension such as disturbances, isolated and sporadic acts of violence or other acts of a similar nature. . . .